Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 06:08

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
The BEST exercise for heart health, according to top US cardiac surgeon - Times of India
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Creatine supports brain and muscle health during every stage of life - Earth.com
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Don’t Miss This Rare Chance to See the Milky Way’s Glowing Core - SciTechDaily
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
A two-player Elden Ring Nightreign PC Mod is already available - Eurogamer
Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.